COMPANY RESEARCHEB613 is oral PTH(1-34), with disclosed clinical results and new-formulation bridging data and a planned Phase 3 program. Human evidence for this linear peptide is used only as a platform reference.
Profile review: 2026-11-04 · Fields retain their individual source dates. Undisclosed values are not zero; early or historical events do not establish the latest financing. Awards and acquisitions are distinguished from equity rounds.
Disease tags match recorded text mentions and require program-level verification.
EB613 is oral PTH(1-34), with disclosed clinical results and new-formulation bridging data and a planned Phase 3 program. Human evidence for this linear peptide is used only as a platform reference.
| Program / service | Target / indication | Representative stage | Evidence & scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| EB613 | PTH1R · Osteoporosis | II期结果 | Clinical and formulation-bridging PK / PD data disclosed |
Company-name matches are discovery leads; verify entity identity and transaction roles in the original source.
No cataloged update explicitly mentions this company.
Johnson & Johnson reported that 58% of patients receiving icotrokinra 200 mg achieved ACR20 at Week 16 in ICONIC-PsA 1, versus 41% with placebo. The oral IL-23 receptor peptide also showed skin responses. The company reported no new safety signals through Week 24; active psoriatic arthritis remains an investigational indication.
Entera reported $265.9 million in cash and cash equivalents at September 30, plus $6.5 million in restricted cash. Its November 6 update targets first site activation for an approximately 900-patient EB613 osteoporosis Phase 3 trial in late 2026. EB613 is an oral PTH(1-34) program, included here as an adjacent oral-peptide delivery development, not a cyclic-peptide candidate.
Johnson & Johnson reported that ICONIC-ASCEND met its Week 16 co-primary endpoints: PASI 90 responses were 55.2% with icotrokinra versus 3.6% with placebo, and IGA 0/1 responses were 70.4% versus 9.5%. At Week 28, the oral peptide met noninferiority criteria versus ustekinumab across multiplicity-controlled key secondary skin-clearance endpoints.
Discussions are for signed-in members. Personal notes remain separate from company research.
Sign in to joinInclusion is not endorsement or partner qualification. Assess company claims, clinical evidence, and project-specific capabilities separately.